Abstract

In this talk, I will explain how to construct succinct classical interactive arguments for QMA, using only standard cryptographic assumptions (implied by LWE). Our approach builds on Kalai, Lombardi, Vaikuntanathan’s “compiler” to convert a two-prover interactive proof in the MIP* model into a one-prover interactive argument, and achieves succinctness by combining ideas from the MIP* literature with post-quantum succinct arguments of knowledge. Perhaps unexpectedly, our construction does not yield any form of quantum PCP—neither a “Hamiltonian” PCP nor a “games” PCP—in contrast to the situation in the classical world, where PCPs appear to be inherent to succinct arguments for NP.

Based on joint work with Tony Metger and Tina Zhang (2404.19754)

Video Recording